Author
Message
Zebez
Unfettered
Joined: 17 Jul 2011 Posts: 618
Stanislav wrote:
Wait--how does that make it easier? I am confusion.
Speaking of confusion, it kind of looks like a lot of missing no. pasted on top of each other.
I'm not sure that picture works quite well. If it's edited could the important part be edited out? Or are you just trying to highlight the figure? I don't think the figure is definitively anyone. It looks like they're wearing a hoody but at least three characters in the series wear a hoody and even if I see a hoody then it still might not be a hoody.
Posted: Mon Jul 30, 2012 10:20 pm
NathanJ
Greenhorn
Joined: 30 Jul 2012 Posts: 6
neko wrote:
If we remove the non-edited portion of the image, you can better see that the figure is Alex.
-le snip-
sir you prove nothing (other than the fact that it's a jpg)
on the other hand I removed the "blurred portion" and highlighted the figure. (not that this will prove anything either... but we must try everythig!!!)
Posted: Mon Jul 30, 2012 10:29 pm
killerfurball
Greenhorn
Joined: 30 Jul 2012 Posts: 5
NathanJ wrote:
neko wrote:
If we remove the non-edited portion of the image, you can better see that the figure is Alex.
-le snip-
sir you prove nothing (other than the fact that it's a jpg)
on the other hand I removed the "blurred portion" and highlighted the figure. (not that this will prove anything either... but we must try everythig!!!)
*picture*
This enhanced image makes it look a lot like the person is in front of the window frame here. The right shoulder seems to go past the frame itself.
Posted: Mon Jul 30, 2012 10:39 pm
chaos_angel
Veteran
Joined: 03 Jul 2011 Posts: 100
killerfurball wrote:
NathanJ wrote:
neko wrote:
If we remove the non-edited portion of the image, you can better see that the figure is Alex.
-le snip-
sir you prove nothing (other than the fact that it's a jpg)
on the other hand I removed the "blurred portion" and highlighted the figure. (not that this will prove anything either... but we must try everythig!!!)
*picture*
This enhanced image makes it look a lot like the person is in front of the window frame here. The right shoulder seems to go past the frame itself.
It also kind of looks to me like the person is facing away from us.
_________________Love is like... Imagine four balls on the edge of a screen that is threatening you with death. - GameGodOfAll
Posted: Mon Jul 30, 2012 10:55 pm
killerfurball
Greenhorn
Joined: 30 Jul 2012 Posts: 5
chaos_angel wrote:
killerfurball wrote:
NathanJ wrote:
neko wrote:
If we remove the non-edited portion of the image, you can better see that the figure is Alex.
-le snip-
sir you prove nothing (other than the fact that it's a jpg)
on the other hand I removed the "blurred portion" and highlighted the figure. (not that this will prove anything either... but we must try everythig!!!)
*picture*
This enhanced image makes it look a lot like the person is in front of the window frame here. The right shoulder seems to go past the frame itself.
It also kind of looks to me like the person is facing away from us.
I noticed that as well. Couldn't decide if the person had their head slightly turned or if I was forcing myself to see that. With how the light looks it would appear this pictures has been taken inside a building.
Posted: Mon Jul 30, 2012 11:07 pm
pravado
Unfictologist
Joined: 22 Apr 2011 Posts: 1833
oh hey a picture of an unknown person standing somewhere
(seriously are we even trying anymore)
Posted: Mon Jul 30, 2012 11:17 pm
Link
Boot
Joined: 24 Oct 2011 Posts: 24
It seems that someone took the photo and then immediately turned around, while the shutter was still open and they were still holding up the camera, causing the motion blur to the left.
The white dots are almost certainly digital camera artifacts called "noise", caused by increased light sensitivity. When you take digital photos in the dark without a flash, some cameras automatically increase the sensitivity (they also automatically lengthen the exposure time, which would have caused the motion blur). An interesting side note - image noise can also be caused by electromagnetic radiation.
So, the photo was taken with a digital camera, at night, with the flash off, and the person who took it was apparently in a hurry to turn away.
Posted: Mon Jul 30, 2012 11:25 pm
SHODAN
Veteran
Joined: 05 Apr 2011 Posts: 75
It's too blurry to definitely say who it was.
That being said, breaking the photo down there's really two points of interest, whatever building that is and whoever is there.
The building looks police station / hospital ish.
My first guess at the figure is Tim, and I think we are meant to think that because of Jay's intervention he's back in a hospital somewhere. Possible jailbreak?
Posted: Mon Jul 30, 2012 11:26 pm
fezstudios
Decorated
Joined: 22 Jul 2012 Posts: 235 Location: ???
slendywasphone wrote:
This sorta opened my eyes up. I thought it was one big window, but now I see it's a smaller one
why did I not see this before
why
or, it could also be a slendyport captured in a split second.
WHY DO YOU DO THIS TO US, MH[/strike]
Posted: Mon Jul 30, 2012 11:33 pm
aidansean
Unfettered
Joined: 03 Mar 2012 Posts: 312
It's Alex's window from Entry #45. It's easier to see if you watch the video. The thick black line is from the window frame itself.
Edit: So does this mean Alex is still alive?
Edit edit: totheark already told us that Alex is still alive in Decay. Duh.
Description
Filesize
45.64KB
Viewed
50 Time(s)
Posted: Tue Jul 31, 2012 1:22 am
Lithp
Unfictologist
Joined: 04 Mar 2012 Posts: 1304
If that's true, then the only way this is remotely important is if it's someone other than Alex.
Posted: Tue Jul 31, 2012 1:51 am
NewInTown2
Unfettered
Joined: 03 Jun 2011 Posts: 374
What if this means Jay has been captured?
Think about it, maybe Jay heard some sound outside the room of his hotel/wherever he was, picked up his camera and started filming... He then got a shot of TTA standing outside his room.
And now TTA uploads the shot on Jay's Twitter.
I mean if the person that took the picture was TTA there are 2 possibilities:
1) The person standing outside was Jay. Unlikely because normally he would have told us if he went on a nightly escapade to TTA's lair.
2 It was someone else, but then why would TTA post it on Jay's Twitter? To indicate TTA is in danger and in need of help? Doesn't really seems like TTA's MO to me.
Spoiler (Rollover to View):
We will wait for you no more. Control is being taken away from you. From a start, this has been a game for us. Not anymore. I'm coming for you, and you will lead me to the ark.
Posted: Tue Jul 31, 2012 2:02 am
pravado
Unfictologist
Joined: 22 Apr 2011 Posts: 1833
aidansean wrote:
It's Alex's window from Entry #45. It's easier to see if you watch the video. The thick black line is from the window frame itself.
Edit: So does this mean Alex is still alive?
Edit edit: totheark already told us that Alex is still alive in Decay. Duh.
nice discovery
so alex is hackin jays account huh
whats this supposed to mean
do we dig through the twitter to search for stuff alex wouldn't want us seeing
Posted: Tue Jul 31, 2012 2:31 am
aidansean
Unfettered
Joined: 03 Mar 2012 Posts: 312
Lithp wrote:
If that's true, then the only way this is remotely important is if it's someone other than Alex.
Whoa. If tta found Alex then Alex might not be alive for much longer.
pravado wrote:
so alex is hackin jays account huh
whats this supposed to mean
"Help"?
Posted: Tue Jul 31, 2012 3:43 am
S.Reay051
Boot
Joined: 23 Jul 2012 Posts: 29 Location: O3XO5XOO3
Wow, living in a different time zone than you makes it difficult to follow any news. Yesterday before going to sleep there was nothing new on twitter yet, and this morning I already missed pages of posts about the new pic.
Nice finds, people. I don't think there's anything I could still add to that.
Posted: Tue Jul 31, 2012 3:55 am
Display posts from previous: All Posts 1 Day 1 Week 2 Weeks 1 Month 3 Months 6 Months 1 Year Sort by: Post Time Post Subject Author Ascending Descending