| Author |
Message |
| catherwood |
| xnbomb wrote: |
| plugs wrote: |
| Not working for me at all. Just getting a red X :( |
There are a few reasons this might happen. But one that I found last week is that the applet doesn't seem to work with the latest Java Runtime Environment. Uninstalling it and then installing an older one seemed to work better. |
This is true. The unfiction chat applet is out-of-date, but Chat Solutions (where the unfiction chat is hosted) has a better java chat applet for your browser. Try this:
http://www.chat-solutions.org/chat/unfiction.html
(much easier than uninstalling good software, and it has more features than the old applet)
 Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 9:39 pm
|
 |
| xnbomb |
| plugs wrote: |
Not working for me at all. Just getting a red X  |
There are a few reasons this might happen. But one that I found last week is that the applet doesn't seem to work with the latest Java Runtime Environment. Uninstalling it and then installing an older one seemed to work better.
 Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 8:25 pm
|
 |
| plugs |
Not working for me at all. Just getting a red X 
 Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 6:36 pm
|
 |
| ncfriend |
thanks xn... how did you get to be so smart?
foshizzle!
 Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 12:59 pm
|
 |
| xnbomb |
There has been a certain amount of turnover in the Chat Solutions servers. The safest option is always to try and connect to irc.chat-solutions.org, because that should in theory get you to some active server. As of the date of this post, the three servers that I know of on the network are asteroid.chat-solutions.org, radiant.chat-solutions.org, and stardust.chat-solutions.org. I suppose individual IPs for these could work as well, but I have no idea if the ones listed in the java client's pulldown match those of the current servers.
(And although it is now gone ... foshizzle forever!)
 Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2007 9:54 pm
|
 |
| ncfriend |
| Quote: |
# rc.chat-solutions.org
# riprock.chat-solutions.org
# irc.chat-solutions.co.uk
# cristal.chat-solutions.org <-- see below, this no longer works
# foshizzle.chat-solutions.org
# radiant.chat-solutions.org <-- new added early 2007
# 69.28.250.135
# 217.160.211.173
# 69.28.250.199
# 69.80.195.68 <-- new added early 2007 |
how many of these are actually working for anyone using Chatzilla?
 Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2007 7:52 pm
|
 |
| Ruuku |
I would love a new haircut, thanks Santa!
 Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 7:33 am
|
 |
| SpaceBass |
Re: I want to have a chat made for Sector Seven
| Alsray wrote: |
i want a plae that the people working on Sector Seven can interact and tlka baout findings, and a place for my "Agents" to meet for meetings about our approch at it.
It would be very Helpfull |
Your wish is my command. Come talk to me here! #s7 via Java or #s7 via your IRC client.
 Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 8:34 pm
|
 |
| Alsray |
I want to have a chat made for Sector Seven
i want a plae that the people working on Sector Seven can interact and tlka baout findings, and a place for my "Agents" to meet for meetings about our approch at it.
It would be very Helpfull
 Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 3:33 pm
|
 |
| imbri |
Just an FYI - I've split the growing meta discussion off and put it into the Meta forum. It's a great meta discussion - what happens where, are the non-chatters left out, how can we best share between chat & the forums, etc - that comes up every now and again. So, if you're looking for such a discussion go to this thread in the Meta forum. Please keep the convo here on problems and issues related, not to chat, but to the actual unfiction java client. Thanks 
 Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2006 11:21 am
|
 |
| thebruce |
I'm getting it regularly on and off both at home and at work using hydrairc. At first I thought it was firewall, then I thought maybe I somehow got banned, but some days it works, and some not, sometimes at work and sometimes at home. Is chat-solutions having some intermittent server problems? Or am I alone on this entirely?
 Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2006 3:00 pm
|
 |
| catherwood |
| Kain211 wrote: |
Connecting to server...
Unable to connect to server
Connecting to server please wait.... |
This is probably because chat-solutions recently retired the cristal server (and added a new one named riprock). I've been getting the same initial failed connection at work, but a few minutes later it does connect (probably to foshizzle but I haven't checked.)
This has nothing to do with your browser or platform. I'm not sure if SpaceBass needs to alter the launch code in the Java applet, to get it to look for another server. I'm surprised that yours doesn't eventually connect -- try again later, as there are occasional outages.
(this is, of course, assuming that you have been able to connect in the past, and that this is a recent change in behaviour for you; usual disclaimers about firewalls still apply.)
 Posted: Sat Nov 18, 2006 11:25 am
|
 |
| Kain211 |
Hey guys, just tried to get on chat and got this kickback
Connecting to server...
Unable to connect to server
Connecting to server please wait....
and it stayed like that for 10 minuites before i closed it..and i also tried it on fire fox and IE, i get the same response. Any ideas?
 Posted: Sat Nov 18, 2006 11:01 am
|
 |
| molecularr |
I just want to add that the reason the original Ny Takma thread got so long was mainly that we were still in News and Rumors and couldn't spread out. We got much more organized in ARGs with Potential, especially when we got a wiki .
And wrt to chat, I agree that too much chatter can crowd out the useful info in a thread, but it's pretty easy to skim through chatter, in my experience. I think it's more important to foster openness and casualness, and much that is productive like speculation or strategizing comes about from casual conversation. Basically, I don't think anyone should be in a position where they refrain from posting because they're afraid someone else might think their comments are "chatter." Conversely, no one should feel left out of a community because they can't or don't IRC. So it's a balance between two extremes, but I think ideally anyone posting in a community like this one should be able to figure out how to contribute effectively to the conversation pretty quickly.
 Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 12:03 pm
|
 |
| Phaedra |
Re: neatness rocks, clutter sucks
a little long but a necessary read
Okay, a lot of the points you make are good ones, and certainly attempts to keep the noise-to-signal ratio as low as possible are useful, but...
I'm not sure I agree that any "irrelevant" chatter should be confined to chat or to PM.
First, sometimes it's hard to say what's relevant. Second, off-topic chatter is annoying if there's too much of it, but in limited quantities it helps the community bond and keeps things casual. But most importantly, not everyone has time to hang out in chat, and not everyone can access it from school or work. During Last Call Poker, a lot of people who couldn't use chat felt left out because so much of the discussion was confined to chat, for example.
What takes place in chat is transitory, and only aids the people who are in the chat channel at that precise moment.
What happens on the forum is permanent, and there for all the world to see.
Chat is a pretty exclusive medium, whereas forum posts are inclusive.
ETA: cristal.chat-solutions.org is no longer active, so please don't attempt to use that server.
 Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 9:30 am
|
 |
|
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|