| Author |
Message |
| Xeno Lambrose |
Welcome respawn;
Yes, TROGL along with the circled word BINDER and part of the word backbone being blacked out does mean something.
We just need to put our thinking hats on and get to work figuring what they all mean!
Thanks,
XL
 Posted: Sat Dec 18, 2010 11:24 am
|
 |
| respawn |
ive been lurking this ARG since the initial beginning of it when i heard about the preview reels and iron man 2 and all that jazz. i finally made an account though because i want to start to contribute instead of just lurking.
my hypothesis is that possibly trogl could be a key to something like a password or a codeword for confirmation. or it they could be an acronym for what they call the creature
 Posted: Sat Dec 18, 2010 11:19 am
|
 |
| Melodyman |
If you watched the chat live there wasnt enough time for anyone to respond to anything. He typed out line after line nonstop. took all of 2 minutes.
Interesting idea tho..
 Posted: Fri Dec 17, 2010 9:38 pm
|
 |
| punxtr |
Lol nice for the dig!
Anyway, from the scanned picture... Myst no longer seems like an Atrus... too bad!
 Posted: Fri Dec 17, 2010 9:35 pm
|
 |
| r.m |
Jane Smith wrote:
| Quote: |
I use Vent for Gaming some people dont ahve or cant use a mic for reasons*
So one sided chat is somthing we see when one is on vent and another is typing reponce:
[Host]: I need that book. I hope you haven't changed your mind.
Say what are you offering in return?
[Host]: I can still help you find your father.
say Why are you leaving / where are you going?
[Host]: I can't stay. In the good faith, I'll upload a picture. You told me you wanted to see him.
say Tell me how did you know my father?
[Host]: We were co-workers. A long time ago.
say Why did he tell you all this?
[Host]: he trusted me.
[Host]: when others didn't
[Host]: he knew I understood what he went through
say when can we talk again?
[Host]: i'll be here next week. same protocol.
Thats my take on it (kinda) still disapointed alot tho...
Jane |
Jane -
Your idea about the one voice / one type chat makes a lot of sense. Maybe the typist (mysterio/Rand Miller ) actually is someone whose voice Josh would recognize. Whatever the reasoning is for the one-sided chat - I hope it was intentional and not sloppy planning.
 Posted: Fri Dec 17, 2010 9:24 pm
|
 |
| Xeno Lambrose |
Jane Smith;
You forgot:
"say 'what you talkin bout Willis?"
 Posted: Fri Dec 17, 2010 4:43 am
|
 |
| xumx |
good job. now that's settled
 Posted: Fri Dec 17, 2010 4:36 am
|
 |
| sup3rvIII |
Excellent find
Yesterday I looked for hours to find it online..
 Posted: Fri Dec 17, 2010 3:16 am
|
 |
| r.m |
Moby Dick inside title page
Here's a link that has internal art variations.: http://www.classicscentral.com/newart.htm
The inside title page from this last printout is in the first row last column. It's small and not a very clear picture, but at least you can see it all.
Here's a pic:

 Posted: Fri Dec 17, 2010 3:13 am
|
 |
| Jane Smith |
I use Vent for Gaming some people dont ahve or cant use a mic for reasons*
So one sided chat is somthing we see when one is on vent and another is typing reponce:
[Host]: I need that book. I hope you haven't changed your mind.
Say what are you offering in return?
[Host]: I can still help you find your father.
say Why are you leaving / where are you going?
[Host]: I can't stay. In the good faith, I'll upload a picture. You told me you wanted to see him.
say Tell me how did you know my father?
[Host]: We were co-workers. A long time ago.
say Why did he tell you all this?
[Host]: he trusted me.
[Host]: when others didn't
[Host]: he knew I understood what he went through
say when can we talk again?
[Host]: i'll be here next week. same protocol.
Thats my take on it (kinda) still disapointed alot tho...
Jane
 Posted: Fri Dec 17, 2010 12:30 am
|
 |
| Xeno Lambrose |
A few thoughts
Just a though...
What if Josh has been developing more of a relationship with Sarah than he's letting his blogees no about. I mean if he has talking their relationship beyond the workplace, would he be wanting to blab about it to others online? I don't think so based upon the type of character the PMs have been painting him. And would his superior want the world (not to mention clever Clive) to know? I think not?
And just supposing they're more than colleagues now, Josh may have confided in Sarah about Mysterio, and she slapped some sense into him.
"From what you've shown me about this mystery man, Josh, can't you see that you've been giving him the farm, and in return, you've been getting what? Vague promises, no answers to your questions. Why don't you see what happens when you DON'T reply to his next chat--see what he's willing to do, or to tell you that will really help you. He may just be a con!"
My take, anyway..
 Posted: Fri Dec 17, 2010 12:21 am
|
 |
| kelwhite01 |
Where's the uploaded picture?
 Posted: Thu Dec 16, 2010 10:28 pm
|
 |
| kelwhite01 |
Next week?!? $#!#*^%$#@
 Posted: Thu Dec 16, 2010 10:27 pm
|
 |
| Melodyman |
Unfarking real! Another punt! This is getting old..
 Posted: Thu Dec 16, 2010 10:24 pm
|
 |
| Kidjim25 |
same password as before?
 Posted: Thu Dec 16, 2010 10:22 pm
|
 |
|
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|