Hmm, well maybe they haven't updated to April yet. I managed to get to this page via the "More / In the magazine" link in the footer of readersdigest.com...
Maybe it'll show up when they finally get to April?
Posted: Wed Apr 07, 2010 12:39 pm
rose
Jane mcG
readers digest
So my sister called to tell me that Readers Digest has a photo and a paragraph about Jane McGonigal this month. ( the cover is a photo of Micheal J. Fox) I don't get Readers Digest and I couldn't find a link. Maybe someone else has seen it?
I wish the article talked more about the upcoming panel in Edinburgh with Dan Hon, Alex Fleetwood, David Varela, and Yomi Ayeni. Still, seems a decent enough write-up.
Posted: Fri Aug 08, 2008 7:13 pm
Will 2.0
Re: Trolls
Tresbien wrote:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/03/magazine/03trolls-t.html?ex=1218427200&en=bd1fadd16535c091&ei=5070&emc=eta1
We've all encountered them so if you want to get the inside scoop on trolls check out this NYT article. The comments to it are enlightening as well.
You showed this to me yesterday, thought it was an amazing, yet concerning article.
Short article for game developers on how to attract women to games. They use ARGs as a good example:
Byline says "By Andrea Phillips / November 29, 2005" and i was sure I had seen it posted here before. Yep, by jamesi
http://forums.unfiction.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=13423
(i did a search for "female gamers" and sorted to find posts from 2005)
Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2007 4:42 pm
faeryqueen21
Short article for game developers on how to attract women to games. They use ARGs as a good example:
You can't run to Google to fact-check everything all the time.
Google, schmoogle... I run to SNOPES for all my TRUTH NEEDS.
</threadjack>
Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2007 7:47 am
celina63
[quote="catherwood"]
Quote:
You can't run to Google to fact-check everything all the time.
Google, schmoogle... I run to SNOPES for all my TRUTH NEEDS.
</threadjack>
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 9:59 pm
catherwood
Quote:
Rote memorization seems archaic when every fact is accessible through a Google search. As Salen wrote in the school's proposal, "The meaning of 'knowing' today has shifted from being able to remember and repeat information to being able to find and use it."
I could rebut that, in a new meta thread so as not to thread-jack this one. But I think we need both. Memorize basic math, in case you don't have a calculator handy. Memorize facts and dates to the extent of "cultural literacy", so you can have a working knowledge of what is truth and what is bull-crappy. You can't run to Google to fact-check everything all the time.